our zero...

With the third (and the most rational) doctrine gaining value, the needle moves to yet another brain-tumbling question, as for what actually is that incidental aim that our presence seek and on the first hand do we have to ponder over this in order to reach the objective (if there is anything as attainable as is the dash for the desired end)??
But then there is one thing, very radicle that needs acknowledgement, the fact that we, homosapiens though a common species, do not train the same idea.
We are ditinct and diverse in all aspects [ though nature (the only absolute truth) reveals a paradigm of uniqueness in all its dependent organic identities by the evanescence inherent to its occupants ]. We are a set of divided singularities blatantly refusing to abide by the laws of truth, discreetly occupying every bit of the caboodle.
So, without any idea of the mark that we need to reach, we, with considerate mutual consent are certainly headed to something, some time, some space, some state that may or may not be the cardinal proposition.